Difference between revisions of "Scarsdale ZS"
(→ND20) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== JF21 == | == JF21 == | ||
Coming soon... | Coming soon... | ||
== ND20 == | == ND20 == | ||
Coming soon... | Coming soon... | ||
[[:File:Rawls NC.docx|File:Rawls NC.docx]][[File:2001.09768.pdf]] | |||
== SO20 == | == SO20 == | ||
=== ACs === | === ACs === | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
This aff, I read pretty much every round in SO. It did pretty well against util and other phil, but poorly against kritiks. | This aff, I read pretty much every round in SO. It did pretty well against util and other phil, but poorly against kritiks. | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
This aff, I believe, was not broken. But, I wrote it in case I needed to read it against various kritiks in important rounds. | This aff, I believe, was not broken. But, I wrote it in case I needed to read it against various kritiks in important rounds. | ||
=== NCs === | === NCs === | ||
[[File:SO20 - NC - Hobbes.docx]] | [[File:SO20 - NC - Hobbes.docx]] | ||
Your standard Hobbes NC. | Your standard Hobbes NC. | ||
| Line 28: | Line 25: | ||
Your standard Kant NC. | Your standard Kant NC. | ||
== JF20== | == JF20== | ||
=== ACs === | === ACs === | ||
| Line 39: | Line 35: | ||
I read this aff all rounds at TOC. Lots of fun. I also included different versions of the aff based on the anticipated style of my opponent. | I read this aff all rounds at TOC. Lots of fun. I also included different versions of the aff based on the anticipated style of my opponent. | ||
=== NCs === | === NCs === | ||
[[Media:CD20 - NC - Rawls.docx|CD20 - NC - Rawls.docx]] | [[Media:CD20 - NC - Rawls.docx|CD20 - NC - Rawls.docx]] | ||
This NC I also read a decent amount at TOC. My favorite strat was to go NC AC (which I think is strategic in general). It also includes a nice brief section explaining what constitutes the original position. | This NC I also read a decent amount at TOC. My favorite strat was to go NC AC (which I think is strategic in general). It also includes a nice brief section explaining what constitutes the original position. | ||
== ND19 == | == ND19 == | ||
=== ACs === | === ACs === | ||
[[Media:CDND19AC Coal.docx|CDND19AC Coal.docx]] | [[Media:CDND19AC Coal.docx|CDND19AC Coal.docx]] | ||
== SO19 == | == SO19 == | ||
=== ACs === | === ACs === | ||
Revision as of 01:35, 6 January 2022
Hi, I'm Zach. I debated for Scarsdale High School '21 and broke at the TOC as a junior and senior. As the Scarsdale team worked together to develop many positions, I just posted what I most directly worked on. Feel free to contact me at [/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection [email protected]] with any questions!
JF21
Coming soon...
ND20
Coming soon...
File:Rawls NC.docxFile:2001.09768.pdf
SO20
ACs
File:SO20 - AC - Virtue Ethics.docx
This aff, I read pretty much every round in SO. It did pretty well against util and other phil, but poorly against kritiks.
File:SO20 - AC - Pragmatism.docx
This aff, I believe, was not broken. But, I wrote it in case I needed to read it against various kritiks in important rounds.
NCs
Your standard Hobbes NC.
Your standard Kant NC.
JF20
ACs
Yes, a lot of the cards in this aff were taken from other people, but I spent many hours frontlining it and cutting cards on my own. Too bad I never read it at TOC.
CD20 - AC - Existentialism.docx
I read this aff all rounds at TOC. Lots of fun. I also included different versions of the aff based on the anticipated style of my opponent.
NCs
This NC I also read a decent amount at TOC. My favorite strat was to go NC AC (which I think is strategic in general). It also includes a nice brief section explaining what constitutes the original position.