Difference between revisions of "Scarsdale ZS"

From Circuit Debater LD
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Math testing)
Line 2: Line 2:




This is a test.
 
<math>x^2+2x+4</math>
 
<math>\int^{a}_{b} x^2 dx</math>


== JF21 ==
== JF21 ==

Revision as of 19:20, 4 January 2022

Hi, I'm Zach. I debated for Scarsdale High School '21 and broke at the TOC as a junior and senior. As the Scarsdale team worked together to develop many positions, I just posted what I most directly worked on. Feel free to contact me at [/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b59a9acfd4d6ddd4c7ccf5c6dcd0d2d0d99bd6dad8 [email protected]] with any questions!


JF21

Coming soon...

ND20

Coming soon...

SO20

ACs

File:SO20 - AC - Virtue Ethics.docx

This aff, I read pretty much every round in SO. It did pretty well against util and other phil, but poorly against kritiks.


File:SO20 - AC - Pragmatism.docx

This aff, I believe, was not broken. But, I wrote it in case I needed to read it against various kritiks in important rounds.

NCs

File:SO20 - NC - Hobbes.docx

Your standard Hobbes NC.


File:SO20 - NC - Kant.docx

Your standard Kant NC.

JF20

ACs

CD20 - AC - IndoPak.docx

Yes, a lot of the cards in this aff were taken from other people, but I spent many hours frontlining it and cutting cards on my own. Too bad I never read it at TOC.


CD20 - AC - Existentialism.docx

I read this aff all rounds at TOC. Lots of fun. I also included different versions of the aff based on the anticipated style of my opponent.

NCs

CD20 - NC - Rawls.docx

This NC I also read a decent amount at TOC. My favorite strat was to go NC AC (which I think is strategic in general). It also includes a nice brief section explaining what constitutes the original position.

ND19

ACs

CDND19AC Coal.docx

SO19

ACs

CDSO19AC Policy.docx

CDSO19AC Existentialism.docx

NCs

CDSO19NC Hobbes.docx