NSD Ad V1.png


From Circuit Debater LD
Jump to navigation Jump to search


  • As this is a wiki, anybody should feel free to contribute any resources they can to the various pages.
  • For conversations about maintaining this page with other editors, feel free to use the Discussion page.


Policy debate, commonly referred to as LARP debate, simulates the effects of passing the resolution as a policy option. Plans, counterplans, and disadvantages are commonly read with this style of debate. The framework associated with policy debates is usually utilitarian - minimizing pain and maximizing pleasure.

Click here for the policy page.

Critical Debate[edit]

Critical debate explores a large ranges of topics but usually challenges underlying assumptions of the world and the round, centered around a particular theoretical worldview. These arguments include kritiks ran by the negative debater and non-topical affirmatives that choose not to defend the resolution in order to talk about a different issue.

Click here for the critical debate page.


Theoretical debates attempt to prove that an action another debater commits in the round has a negative consequence on the debate itself. Theoretical debates commonly prove why a debater's action is unfair or uneducational for the debate space and provide a alternative model for which debate should operate.

Click here for the theory page.


Philosophical debates attempt to prove the resolution true or false through a philosophical framework that is used to describe what constitutes morality. There are many different veins of philosophy, ranging from postmodern authors such as Michel Foucalt to Enlightenment Era philosophers like Immanuel Kant.

Click here for the philosophy page.


Tricks debate is often used as a catch all term for a variety of arguments considered tricky, abusive, or designed to invalidate large amounts of the other debater’s offense.

Click here for the tricks page.