Strake Jesuit CS (Clay Spence)

From Circuit Debater LD
Revision as of 03:28, 30 January 2019 by Maintenance script (talk | contribs) (Add archive)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I realize you will probably steal arguments from these cases and theory blocks. I had a penchant for running arguments that tend to be applicable to most topics, so many of the arguments posted here have the potential to be useful in the future. However, I would caution you that the vast majority of the blips in these cases are underdeveloped precisely because I understood the context and implications of my arguments in a much fuller, more sophisticated way than the text of those arguments expressed, and could develop and explain them to judges/opponents. If you steal my arguments you won't have any such advantage. In this vein, it is important to bear in mind that there is absolutely no substitute for spending time reading books and articles on philosophy if you want to become a good framework debater. Email me at [email protected] for reading suggestions/questions/comments. Good luck!

AC_Lyotard.docx
AC_Existentialism.docx
AC_Skep.docx
NC_Discourse Ethics.docx
K_PublicPrivate.docx (unbroken)
AT-NIBS BAD.docx
AT-contingent standards suck.docx
AT-Skep Affirms.doc